bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs


From: Martin Tarenskeen
Subject: inconsistent handling of articulations with slurs
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:55:14 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)



Hi,

Try to compile the following example:

%%%%

\version "2.19.25"

\relative {
  d''-.( d-. d-. d-.)
  d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
  d--( d-- d-- d--)
  d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
  d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
  d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
  d->( d-> d-> d->)
  \break
  \override Slur.outside-staff-priority = #500
  d-.( d-. d-. d-.)
  d-_( d-_ d-_ d-_)
  d--( d-- d-- d--)
  d-^( d-^ d-^ d-^)
  d-+( d-+ d-+ d-+)
  d-!( d-! d-! d-!)
  d->( d-> d-> d->)
}

%%%%

Why are the articulations in bars 2, 7, 9, 14 treated differently? It seems they are aligned with the slurs instead of the notes. Should I forward this to bug-lilypond?

See also attachment for additional strangeness.

--

MT

Attachment: slurs-and-articulation.ly
Description: Text document


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]