Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[tisimst]

On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email] 
> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181534&i=0>> writes:
>
> >>I'm not top posting
> >
> > Hi Squad,
> >
> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
> >
> > %%%%%%%%%%
> > \version "2.19.27"
> >
> > \transpose c c' {
> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
> >   R1*8
> > }
> >
> > \transpose c c' {
> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
> >   R1*8
> > }
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>
> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures without
> the grace notes in them.
>
> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
> talking about?

I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the 
same score):



The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it 
should.

- Abraham


fbbigajb.png (87K) 
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>




--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-notes-and-staff-miss-alignment-tp181529p181536.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.