Re: Grace notes and staff miss-alignment

[David Kastrup]

tisimst <address@hidden> writes:

> On 9/22/2015 9:42 AM, David Kastrup [via Lilypond] wrote:
>> Pierre Perol-Schneider <[hidden email] 
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=181534&i=0>> writes:
>>
>> >>I'm not top posting
>> >
>> > Hi Squad,
>> >
>> > When many grace notes, staves are miss aligned:
>> >
>> > %%%%%%%%%%
>> > \version "2.19.27"
>> >
>> > \transpose c c' {
>> >   \repeat unfold 16 { e'8 a }
>> >   R1*8
>> > }
>> >
>> > \transpose c c' {
>> >   \repeat unfold 16 { \grace dis'8 e' \grace gis8 a }
>> >   R1*8
>> > }
>> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>>
>> Huh?  That example demonstrates that measures with many grace notes in
>> them will take more space than _independently_ typeset measures without
>> the grace notes in them.
>>
>> Which is not surprising at all.  What is the misalignment you are
>> talking about?
>
> I think this is what he meant (first as separate scores, then in the 
> same score):
>
>
>
> The notes line up, but the second system doesn't break/compress like it 
> should.
>
> - Abraham
>
>
> fbbigajb.png (87K)
> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/181536/0/fbbigajb.png>

Well, stuff lines up perfectly on my system.  So where's the difference?
64-bit system vs 32-bit (the latter would be mine)?  Different fonts
(less likely)?

-- 
David Kastrup