Re: bug report: partcombine and multi-measure rests

[Dan Eble]

Simon Albrecht <simon.albrecht <at> mail.de> writes:

> On 18.10.2015 13:25, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > Thanks for the reply. I am not sure I understand your answer, do you 
> > mean that in the tiny example I created I should simply have used a 
> > "Solo I" indication in the fourth bar instead of using rests?
> 
> No, the solo indication should be created automatically by the 
> partcombiner. It isn’t in 2.19.15, but that’s a bug fixed in 2.19.16. Is 
> there any particular reason why you’d need to stick to that version?

I would like to chime in with a reliable statement of help, but I am
not very familiar with the implementation of the force commands.  I
vaguely recall that a force command overrides one particular decision
of the part combiner *at the point it is used* rather than for the
entire span of time until the next force command.  I could be wrong.

David K. should have a much better idea; I think he made changes in
that area recently.  So if you could get his attention--maybe make a
donation--he could probably help you. ;-)

Regards,
-- 
Dan