[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ET microtonal notation

From: Hans Åberg
Subject: Re: ET microtonal notation
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:59:15 +0100

> On 23 Feb 2016, at 18:43, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 23.02.2016 15:59, Hans Åberg wrote:
>>> On 23 Feb 2016, at 15:11, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> It would be easy to make ET typesetting with correct MIDI, plus some,
>>>> if the LilyPond distribution included the files regular.ly,
>>>> definitions.ily, smufldata.ily plus the SMuFL font Bravura.
>>> <rant>
>> It was cc’ed Simon Albrecht, who on the LilyPond User list suggested that to 
>> post better suggestions on this list [1].
> Please have a look at 
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/documentation-suggestions.html>.

The current documentation would become obsolete. It would not be difficult to 
add a few files common ET’s.

>> The first file is mentioned here [2]. The others come from [3-4], also 
>> mentioned in that discussion.
>> 1. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-02/msg00569.html
>> 2. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-02/msg00627.html
>> 3. http://www.openlilylib.org/
>> 4. http://www.smufl.org/
> Still, it’s up to anyone to guess this. And ‘regular.ly’ or ‘definitions.ily’ 
> (really!) are quite commonplace filenames. I don’t know how many dozen files 
> called ‘definitions.ily’ might be in OpenLilyLib.

I’ll send you them in private mail

> So I’m sorry, but speaking of a ‘rant’ is somewhat of an overstatement.
> In the ly-user post of mine that you quoted I spoke of a ‘concise’ request. 
> Perhaps you try and make one.

Just have the files and font included in the LilyPond distribution, as they 
seem to work.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]