[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default font for the web site
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Default font for the web site |
|
Date: |
Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:50:18 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
> I hope you don’t mind if I keep the poll public.
>
> On 03.03.2016 00:29, Ophir Lifshitz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In my opinion, a "classical" look should not be used for a site
>> whose purpose is documentation, but, a font that is very easy to
>> read.
>
> Perhaps one may argue about what kind of fonts is best to read, but
> certainly Garamond is perfectly well legible?
I don't think we should specify non-free fonts. That would make
LilyPond's web site work better on people having installed non-free
fonts than on systems which do not.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Default font for the web site, Paul Morris, 2016/03/03
Re: Default font for the web site, Andrew Bernard, 2016/03/03