bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Remaining lsr-snippets to approve - feed-back needed


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: Remaining lsr-snippets to approve - feed-back needed
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:13:38 +0200

2016-04-04 12:21 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider
<address@hidden>:
> https://notat.io/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=103&start=10
>
> 2016-04-03 12:46 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> ...
>>
>>
>> > (2) Those were drafts, even without description. I forgot to work on
>> > them.
>>
>> Should I keep them for further work?
>
>
> Yes, please.

ok.

>
>>
>> > (3) I don't know. In France there is some rights for copying few
>> > measures in
>> > an article if sources is clearly stated (which I did)
>>
>> I vaguely recall Germany has something akin. We need to be sure
>> world-wide, though.
>
>
> Hmm, world-wide would be hard to find.
> AFAIK, it depends where the LP "organisation" is located. The Netherlands ?
> (e.g. ISMLP follows the canadian rules.)
> For the LSR case, the Italian law would be the one. Or ?

We would be fine if we had the permission.
Maybe you could ask them (graphire.com) and/or David Fuqua?

>
>>
>> > (5) Did you notice I've changed the design ?
>>
>> Yep, though you still need to set with-dimensions and the advantage
>> compared with the built-in markup-command still escapes me.
>
>
> I've slightly modified the file: http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=982
> It's simply an alternative to the standard 'eyeglasses'.
> Please feel free to delete it if you consider that it offers no advantage.
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
>
>

Cheers,
  Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]