[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug
From: |
Mike Solomon |
Subject: |
Re: Bug |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:07:51 +0100 |
On 1 February 2017 at 19.04.40, Trevor Daniels (address@hidden) wrote:
Simon Albrecht wrote Wednesday, February 01, 2017 5:49 PM
> On 01.02.2017 18:08, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
>> Yeah, just checked it out, you can remove the spurious if (brain fart).
>> I don’t have time to propose a patch today but I can do that on Monday if no
>> one else can get around to it (I haven’t set up git-cl yet on this machine).
>> Alternatively, I can just push the change to master if people are OK with
>> that.
>
> Shouldn’t at least the normal patch testing be done?
Yes. This fix isn't urgent, so there's no problem with waiting a few days for
Mike to set up git-cl and to obtain access to the Issue DB at SF. Mike -
set up a SF account and post the user name to the Dev list.
And, Mike, we never push to Master - always to Staging, even after testing.
Trevor
Yeah, my bad, it was from reading
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/uploading-a-patch-for-review
It would help maybe if there was a one-liner specifying that this doesn’t
actually push to master but rather creates a new branch for review (if that’s
what that does).
~Mike
- Re: Bug, Mike Solomon, 2017/02/01
- Re: Bug, Simon Albrecht, 2017/02/01
- Re: Bug, Trevor Daniels, 2017/02/01
- Re: Bug,
Mike Solomon <=
- Re: Bug, David Kastrup, 2017/02/01