[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Coloring broken in Lily 2.19.51? (PNG alpha-transparency coloring is
From: |
Hans Aikema |
Subject: |
Re: Coloring broken in Lily 2.19.51? (PNG alpha-transparency coloring is broken) |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:14:47 +0200 |
On 6 Dec 2016, at 15:40, Masamichi Hosoda <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>> If master is ok, but not the released version, it's more likely a
>>> GUB-problem as David suspected.
>>> Maybe Masimichi-San can could say more, cc-ed.
>>
>> Between LilyPond 2.19.50 and 2.19.51,
>> Ghostscript bundled with the binary distributed on lilypond.org
>> has been updated.
>>
>> 2.19.50 has Ghostscript 9.15.
>> 2.19.51 has Ghostscript 9.20.
>> (Also 2.19.52 has Ghostscript 9.20.)
>>
>> I've tried some versions.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.49 + Ghostscript 9.15:
>> no problem.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.49 + Ghostscript 9.16:
>> no problem.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.49 + Ghostscript 9.18:
>> no problem.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.49 + Ghostscript 9.19:
>> reproduced.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.49 + Ghostscript 9.20:
>> reproduced.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.52 + Ghostscript 9.18:
>> no problem.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.52 + Ghostscript 9.19:
>> reproduced.
>>
>> LilyPond 2.19.52 + Ghostscript 9.20:
>> reproduced.
>
> I've reported it to Ghostscript Bugzilla.
> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697423
Bug has been reported as solved and a new version of ghostscript has recently
been released that incorparates the fix. I’m happy to volunteer testing a new
(Mac OS X) binary with Ghostscript 9.21 packaged, but I’ve failed all attempts
to get a local running GUB build to get a cross-platform build delivering me a
Mac binary to try out.
regards,
Hans Aikema
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Coloring broken in Lily 2.19.51? (PNG alpha-transparency coloring is broken),
Hans Aikema <=