Re: accidentals on merged notes

[Thomas Morley]

2017-08-15 18:54 GMT+02:00 Knut Petersen <address@hidden>:
> Hi Phil!
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Hauke Rehr (from Germany)
>>
>>
>> Looks the same as https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/1134/ ?
>>
> Yes, it is the same old bug/defect/limitation. Although the problem is
> documented in the notation manual I think it actually is a serious defect.
>
> The code that automatically adds accidentals does not support different
> accidentals for the same pitch at the same time. "Merged" notes are not the
> cause of the problem (btw: lilypond never merges noteheads, it prints
> multiple noteheads at the same position).
>
> Have a look at this link <https://musescore.org/en/node/14449> and that link
> <https://music.stackexchange.com/questions/24030/what-does-this-split-stem-notation-mean>
> to see some related examples of music written by Chopin, Ravel and Scriabin
> ...
>
> Knut


Another extreme example:
Ornstein, Wild mans dance
http://imslp.org/wiki/Wild_Men's_Dance%2C_SO_54_(Ornstein%2C_Leo)

Perhaps my old coding here (after an idea by Mike Solomon)
https://archiv.lilypondforum.de/index.php/topic,1176.msg6932.html#msg6932
may be found helpful.

Cheers,
  Harm