Re: Skip should end lyric extender

[David Kastrup]

Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi David!
>
>> The takeaway for this is that extenders at the current point of time
>> often don't work as expected and are pretty hard to make do something
>> useful.  I have a hard time figuring out what the current behavior is
>> supposed to be good for, or what the rules governing it actually are.
>
> Well, you might remember that there is code
> <https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4509/> that improves
> the current LyricExtender syntax.

Uh no, it doesn't?  It _removes_ the current LyricExtender syntax, then
tries to do the right thing by itself.

Interpreting user input sensibly and ignoring user input altogether are
not the same thing.

-- 
David Kastrup