[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style

From: Gilberto Agostinho
Subject: Re: flag position problems with flat-flag style
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 08:13:00 -0700 (MST)

Hi all,

Thanks for all your replies.

David Kastrup wrote
> You don't _need_ to override the whole list.  You could just override
> single properties from it.

You are of course right, David, I can just use: \override
Stem.details.lengths = #'(3.5 3.5 3.5 4.5 5.0 6.0)
Thanks for the tip.

Torsten Hämmerle wrote
> Any automatic interference (even if it's only in a special case like for
> flat-flag-style) could lead to unpredictable results and the user would
> lose
> part of the freedom and flexibility to set any desired value by modifying
> the details lists.
> For this very reason, I think we should keep the original way of dealing
> with Stem details by modifying the list details, even if this means an
> additional step when using flat flags style.

Another idea could be changing the default values of Stem.details.lengths.
Using 4.5 or 4.0 instead of the current default 4.25 for the 32nd note stems
make them look much better for both the flat and modern flags and have very
little difference regarding the default flag, see (top is default value of
4.25, bottom is 4.5):




Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Bugs-f58488.html

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]