[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:50:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form
> for reference. However, it appears nearly all of them have notation
> with missing or incorrect fonts. The HTML versions seem fine and show
> the notation snippets correctly.
Ugh. That's what we have prereleases for. There have been a number of
PDF generation related changes/fixes in master. Would it be possible to
get a comparison of a GUB build from master? Basically, generating the
notation manual with the full GUB process but without actually tagging
or otherwise going through with the 2.21.0 release?
Because that could significantly narrow down the problem.
--
David Kastrup
- PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, James Lowe, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Aaron Hill, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/25
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, David Kastrup, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Masamichi Hosoda, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Knut Petersen, 2018/06/26
- Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts, Phil Holmes, 2018/06/26