[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

From: James Lowe
Subject: Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:02:14 +0100 (BST)

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:50:51 +0200, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> > With the release of 2.19.82, I pulled down the latest docs in PDF form
> > for reference.  However, it appears nearly all of them have notation
> > with missing or incorrect fonts.  The HTML versions seem fine and show
> > the notation snippets correctly.
> Ugh.  That's what we have prereleases for.  There have been a number of
> PDF generation related changes/fixes in master.  Would it be possible to
> get a comparison of a GUB build from master?  Basically, generating the
> notation manual with the full GUB process but without actually tagging
> or otherwise going through with the 2.21.0 release?
> Because that could significantly narrow down the problem.

I don't do GUB but running a make doc on current master and scanning the NR, I 
am not seeing anything obviously wrong.

If Aaron has specific examples (which doc, which page) then maybe I can at 
least confirm this on master if that is going to help or not?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]