Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

[Knut Petersen]

Am 26.06.2018 um 13:50 schrieb Masamichi Hosoda:
> > Masamichi-san?  Any idea?
> >
> > Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > This problems seems to be related to https://codereview.appspot.com/314130043/
> > >
> > > The file http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf seems to be  
> > > the intermediate version of notation.pdf.
> > > pdfinfo shows:
> > >
> > >     Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.06.24:1343
> > >     Producer:       xdvipdfmx (0.7.9)
> > >     CreationDate:   Sun Jun 24 14:43:19 2018 CEST
> > >
> > > 'Producer: xdvipdfmx' is unxpected and definitely broken.
> > >
> > > The file http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.de.pdf is the 
> > > expected final version of notation.de.pdf
> > >   pdfinfo shows:
> > >
> > >     Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.06.24:1347
> > >     Producer:       GPL Ghostscript 9.21
> > >     CreationDate:   Sun Jun 24 14:47:40 2018 CEST
> > >     ModDate:        Sun Jun 24 14:47:40 2018 CEST
> > >
> > > The intermediate pdfs should have been processed with extractpdfmark
> > > and ghostscript according to this snippet from texinfo-rules.make:
> > >
> > >     $(outdir)/%.pdf: $(outdir)/%.texi $(outdir)/version.itexi 
> > > $(outdir)/%.pdf.omf $(outdir)/weblinks.itexi | $(OUT_TEXINFO_MANUALS)
> > >     ifeq ($(WEB_VERSION),yes)
> > >          PDFTEX=$(PDFTEX) PDFLATEX=$(PDFLATEX) $(buildscript-dir)/run-and-check "cd $(outdir); 
> > > texi2pdf $(TEXI2PDF_FLAGS) -D web_version -I $(abs-src-dir) $(TEXINFO_PAPERSIZE_OPTION) $(<F) < 
> > > /dev/null" "$*.texi2pdf.log"
> > >     else
> > >          PDFTEX=$(PDFTEX) PDFLATEX=$(PDFLATEX) $(buildscript-dir)/run-and-check "cd $(outdir); 
> > > texi2pdf $(TEXI2PDF_FLAGS) -I $(abs-src-dir) $(TEXINFO_PAPERSIZE_OPTION) $(<F) < /dev/null" 
> > > "$*.texi2pdf.log"
> > >     endif
> > >     ifeq ($(USE_EXTRACTPDFMARK),yes)
> > >          $(EXTRACTPDFMARK) -o $(outdir)/$*.pdfmark $@
> > >          $(GS920) -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -dAutoRotatePages=/None 
> > > -sOutputFile=$(outdir)/$*.final.pdf -c "30000000 setvmthreshold" -f 
> > > $(top-build-dir)/out-fonts/*.font.ps $(outdir)/$*.pdfmark $@
> > >          rm $@
> > >          mv $(outdir)/$*.final.pdf $@
> > >     endif
> > >
> > > Apparently that worked for notation.de.pdf but not for notation.pdf. Why? At 
> > > the moment I don't see the reason, maybe it's too late.
> > >
> > > @Masamichi: Any idea ?
> > Any non-pattern rule overriding?  Stuff getting copied before being
> > finished because of bad parallelism?  $@ stripping .de. stuff and
> > similar so that everything is going through the same temporary file (not
> > likely I guess) At any rate, it doesn't seem to be related to your
> > recent patches.
> If I understand correctly,
>
> GUB generated correct PDFs for 2.19.81 in Jan. 2018.
> extractpdfmark was used for generating PDFs of all languages including English.
>
> http://lilypond.org/downloads/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.81-1.documentation.tar.bz2
>
> ```
> $ pdfinfo notation.pdf
> Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.01.28:1325
> Producer:       GPL Ghostscript 9.21
> CreationDate:   Sun Jan 28 22:25:13 2018 JST
> ModDate:        Sun Jan 28 22:25:13 2018 JST
> ...
>
> $ pdfinfo notation.de.pdf
> Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.01.28:1333
> Producer:       GPL Ghostscript 9.21
> CreationDate:   Sun Jan 28 22:33:44 2018 JST
> ModDate:        Sun Jan 28 22:33:44 2018 JST
> ...
> ```

Yes.
> However, GUB generated broken PDFs for 2.19.82 in Jun. 2018.
> extractpdfmark was used for generating non-English PDFs.
> For English PDFs, extractpdfmark was not used.
>
> http://lilypond.org/downloads/binaries/documentation/lilypond-2.19.82-1.documentation.tar.bz2
>
> ```
> $ pdfinfo notation.pdf
> Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.06.24:1343
> Producer:       xdvipdfmx (0.7.9)
> CreationDate:   Sun Jun 24 21:43:19 2018 JST
> ...
>
> $ pdfinfo notation.de.pdf
> Creator:         XeTeX output 2018.06.24:1347
> Producer:       GPL Ghostscript 9.21
> CreationDate:   Sun Jun 24 21:47:40 2018 JST
> ModDate:        Sun Jun 24 21:47:40 2018 JST
> ...
> ```

Yes. notation.pdf looks as if extractpdfmark/gs was not used. But the part of 
the build log Phil published clearly proves that extractpdfmark and ghostscript 
were used.

@Phil: If you have a look at the notation.pdf in the build tree: is that file 
ok or  is the same broken version as published on lilypond.org?

> GUB has not been changed between Jan. and Jun.
> Its last change is Aug. 2017.
> https://github.com/gperciva/gub/commits/master

Yes.

Knut