[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:52:25 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "Knut Petersen" <address@hidden>

Yes. notation.pdf looks as if extractpdfmark/gs was not used. But the part of the build log Phil published clearly proves that extractpdfmark and ghostscript were used.

@Phil: If you have a look at the notation.pdf in the build tree: is that file ok or is the same broken version as published on lilypond.org?

Please see the attached outcome from piping find to ls -l. As you see the English notations vary in size, and the small ones lack the embedded fonts.

Phil Holmes

Attachment: NotationSize.txt
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]