|
| From: | David Kastrup |
| Subject: | Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:42:46 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes: >> >>> Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file? >>> If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file, >>> I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs) >>> and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs). >>> >> >> Zipped versions of both log files are attached. Hope this helps. > > To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf > succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex > is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different. Can it be verified whether or not the logs stem from a run actually producing the respective valid and/or invalid PDF files or not? -- David Kastrup
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |