[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:42:46 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file?
>>> If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file,
>>> I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs)
>>> and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs).
>> Zipped versions of both log files are attached.  Hope this helps.
> To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf
> succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex
> is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different.

Can it be verified whether or not the logs stem from a run actually
producing the respective valid and/or invalid PDF files or not?

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]