Re: Gregorian.ly bar forms being converted to wrong glyph (regression between 2.22 and 2.24)

[Grant Diffey]

Werner,

I think the remaining question is how common is this as a style? (I find
many examples in books but few online :) and does that warrant adding an
additional staff type?

I'm very happy with the outcome here.  My thanks to all involved,
particularly Dan.

I do wonder if there's a way to make the horizontal spacing.. 'nicer' but
it's certainly functional for all my purposes as is.

Grant.


On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 4:53 PM Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:

>
> >> However none of the staff types dan suggested will do what I could
> >> previously do. Gregorian divisiones not supported on modern staffs
> >> is a reasonable closure for this as a bug however I've previously
> >> been able to use the gregorian divisions on a 'normal staff' so
> >> from my pov this is a regression.
> >
> > Does either of these suit your purpose?  [...]
>
> The whole issue probably warrants an improvement of the documentation,
> helping users in the transition to the new syntax.
>
> Grant, assuming that Dan's code in his last reply fits your needs, can
> you suggest a better wording (in the 'v2.25' documentation)?
>
>
>     Werner
>