|
From: | Colin Campbell |
Subject: | Re: Crash in 2.25.4 |
Date: | Sat, 27 May 2023 20:36:24 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.11.0 |
On 2023-05-27 16:45, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
Le dimanche 28 mai 2023 à 00:38 +0200, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :Le samedi 27 mai 2023 à 16:31 -0600, Colin Campbell a écrit :The "1.0" version number denotes an ABI compatibility promise as far as I understand; current versions of Pango are actually around 1.50. (1.0.0 is from around 2002.)I generally keep my system current, and libpango is at 1.0-0 already.So, just to confirm, "sudo apt upgrade libpango1.0-0" said Pango was already the latest version?Oh, and also check "sudo apt upgrade fontconfig"
Well, colour me embarrassed! First, I had applied your patches using git cola, and received a confirmation screen saying the patches were applied. Being suspicious, I had a look at the actual files with Kate, and found no patches had actually been applied to the source. I applied your FCPatternPrint patch, rebuilt lilypond, and re-ran the test. The job failed, and logs are appended.
Also, and I blame long hours at the lathe, turning scrap wood into bowls, I misread the icon in synaptic: libpango was available, not installed. I blushed, and installed it before this last round of rebuilding lilypond.
fclog.log
Description: Text Data
lilylog.log
Description: Text Data
lilypond-tmp-3950038.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |