[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug report
From: |
Paul D. Smith |
Subject: |
Re: bug report |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:08:29 -0500 |
%% "Sandeep Nema" <address@hidden> writes:
sn> GNU make version: 3.80
sn> O/S: AIX 5.0
sn> We used "?:" macro substitution on tru64 platform with their make, and
sn> it works as following:
sn> X= $(EXCLUDE_X?:$(TMP_ADD_X))
sn> in the above if EXCLUDE_X is defined then X will be empty, if not
sn> defined it will be equal to TMP_ADD_X.
What does "defined" mean here? Does it mean "has some non-empty value",
or does it mean "has been set in any way, including to the empty value"?
sn> This does not give any error while making with GNU make on AIX,
sn> but does not work, i.e. does not substitute X with TMP_ADD_X.
Correct. This syntax is not supported by GNU make.
sn> I feel, if there is no "?:" operator, it should give a syntax
sn> error.
Why would it give a syntax error, when that's not a syntax error?
sn> Do you have any shorter alternative in GNU make other than
sn> "ifdef".
Since you didn't specify exactly what behavior "?:" provides I can't say
for sure, but look up the ?= assignment operator in the GNU make manual.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist