[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe"
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe" |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:13:41 -0500 |
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:53 -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> An essential design choice. This stuff relies on reads and writes of the
> job_fd being atomic and the writes never blocking. POSIX guarantees a 4K
> buffer for pipes. Perhaps the code should check the resource limit and
> complain if the -j argument exceeds the resource limit: "Error: why
> don't you just use '-j' ??"
Yes, that's a good idea. I will add some error checking to the code
that initially seeds the pipe with tokens.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.paulandlesley.org
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", Ken Takusagawa, 2007/01/09
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", James Coleman, 2007/01/09
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", Paul Smith, 2007/01/09
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", James Coleman, 2007/01/09
- RE: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", lasse.makholm, 2007/01/10
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", Howard Chu, 2007/01/10
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", james coleman, 2007/01/10
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe", Howard Chu, 2007/01/10
- Re: EAGAIN in "read jobs pipe",
Paul Smith <=