[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc build process slowness
|
From: |
Roland McGrath |
|
Subject: |
Re: glibc build process slowness |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:21:44 -0800 (PST) |
> the old rule has 1 target (or multiple identical targets)
> and
> there exists a target in the new rule the same as the old rule's target
>
> See attached makefile which demonstrates this. Is that the correct
> behaviour? It seems like it would make more sense to compare the
> target lists for equality.
I think it should match any rule whose target list is a subset of the new
rule's list, without regard to order.
Thanks,
Roland
- glibc build process slowness, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/21
- Re: glibc build process slowness,
Roland McGrath <=
- [PATCH 0/5] Improve performance of rule handling, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- [PATCH 3/5] Refactor: Use a doubly-linked list of rules instead of a singly-linked list, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- [PATCH 1/5] Refactor: Move rule comparisons into separate functions, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- [PATCH 2/5] Clean up count_implicit_rule_limits(), Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- [PATCH 4/5] Record rule targets in a hash table, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- [PATCH 5/5] Hook up hash table: use for searching for rules to replace, Mark Seaborn, 2007/02/25
- Re: glibc build process slowness, Paul Smith, 2007/02/25