[bug #102] Make prints an incorrect error for missing includes

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #7, bug #102 (project make):

(It's me from comment #6 again.)

I've just read

http://make.paulandlesley.org/autodep.html

and want to point out that the advanced procedure presented there (building
dependency information together with objectes, plus avoiding the error message
we discuss here) would not work for the case that the order of object builds
matters: It does for Fortran 90, where a module build needs the modules it
depends on being built first (with some compilers at least).

So, the automake approach does not make this bug report obsolete (apart from
me not liking it doing unnecessary work during rebuilds).

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?102>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/