bug-make
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes


From: Ozkan Sezer
Subject: Re: [bug #27809] several win64 fixes
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 13:18:12 +0300

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Ozkan Sezer <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:42:52 +0300
>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
>>> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>>>
>>> > From: "Paul D. Smith" <address@hidden>
>>> > Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:32:15 +0000
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Follow-up Comment #9, bug #27809 (project make):
>>> >
>>> > I've applied most of the second patch.  The first patch is mostly in the 
>>> > w32
>>> > area so maybe Eli is a better person to review it?
>>>
>>> I will try to do that over the next few days.
>>
>> I have a question regarding this patch:
>>
>>  diff -u -p -r2.27 config.h.W32.template
>>  --- config.h.W32.template     25 Oct 2009 18:56:44 -0000      2.27
>>  +++ config.h.W32.template     5 Jul 2010 19:43:20 -0000
>>  @@ -426,7 +426,11 @@ this program.  If not, see <http://www.g
>>   /* Define to `int' if <sys/types.h> does not define. */
>>   /* GCC 4.x reportedly defines pid_t.  */
>>   #ifndef _PID_T_
>>  +#ifndef _WIN64
>>   #define pid_t int
>>  +#else
>>  +#define pid_t __int64
>>  +#endif
>>   #endif
>>
>> Why is this needed?  Is there really a MinGW64 port of GCC whose
>> version is less than 4?  If MinGW64 only has GCC 4.x or later, it is
>> supposed to define pid_t in the header files supplied with GCC.
>> Please check.
>>
>
> Yes there is: w64 is supported since gcc-4.4 (even 4.3 may
> be used but very limited so that doesn't count) and I am really
> amazed how people doesn't know that. So, for the record,
> everything that I posted here are regarding gcc, not any other
> compiler. Oh, and for the runtime, headers, etc. regarding w64-
> gcc, go to: mingw-w64.sourceforge.net
>

Oh, oh sorry... W64 port with gcc < 4.x:  That part no, there is not.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]