Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j

[David Boyce]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, David Boyce <address@hidden> wrote:
> So I've made a proof-of-concept patch
> against 3.82.90 which seems to work without that overhead and my
> question is, would this be of interest towards 3.83?

Ping?

The original patch attachment was made by hand using "diff -u" and I
had some trouble applying it myself. So here's a version created with
"cvs -q diff -uN" which should work better.

I've done copyright assignment paperwork in the past, BTW.

-David Boyce