Re: patch to support output synchronization under -j

[David Boyce]

On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes, but a few words about how is this semaphore supposed to get job
> done, and in fact what kind of "synchronization" will this bring to
> Make, would be appreciated.  I don't think you described the feature
> too much in your original post.

No, but what I did say was " I won't go into how it works because
that's already done at the URLs above". Do you have specific questions
not addressed there? They're both pretty short, and I really can't
tell what more needs to be said without some context.

David