[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily. |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:35:18 -0500 |
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 17:07 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Does it even make sense to use -j with no arguments? Should we
> perhaps remove that possibility, or have some internal sane limit,
> like twice the number of cores, say?
In general I'd say no, the current behavior is not ideal. However I
don't want to remove the behavior. I'd rather have the default, if
given no argument, choose a "sane" limit. However, how does one detect
the number of cores on a system in a portable way? It's easy enough on
Linux but...
- need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Wang, Warner, 2012/12/14
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Paul Smith, 2012/12/14
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/14
- RE: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Wang, Warner, 2012/12/14
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/14
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Dmitry V. Levin, 2012/12/14
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/15
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily.,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Dmitry V. Levin, 2012/12/15
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/15
- Re: need help on "make -j" parameter, it will let the system hung easily., Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/15