[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch

From: David Boyce
Subject: Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:32:32 -0400

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Frank Heckenbach <address@hidden> wrote

This might be right (I was just objecting to your claim that it was
necessarily so on any 32-bit Unix), and I'd prefer to use fd's

Well ... Linux is not Unix, as partisans will proudly tell you, so technically what I said is unobjectionable.  I won't pretend that that's what I meant though. Presumably the real distinction is between statically and dynamically linked binaries; anything linked statically with libc would need to contain an actual FILE struct, not just a pointer to one.

But that aside, we're all in violent agreement so we can let this sub-thread drop.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]