[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: [bug #33138] .PARLLELSYNC enhancement with patch
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 05:49:28 +0300

> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:55:59 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy <address@hidden>
> Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> trying to pass kernel object handles around (seems a bit nasty to
> me)?

Why is that nasty?  The handle is returned by a documented interface,
and communicating it to another process is an officially documented
technique.  How is that different from passing file descriptors, which
are indices into a kernel-maintained array?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]