[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82 |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:14:01 +0300 |
> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:54:10 -0400
>
> On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 19:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The .ONESHELL feature is now supported on MS-Windows, for the default
> > Windows shell (cmd.exe) or compatible replacements, in the development
> > version (commit e56aad4).
>
> Nice!
I see you followed this up with a commit (30843de) which moved code
around that deals with the one_shell use case. What was the reason
for that change? I think it breaks the use case where a Unixy shell
is used on MS-Windows under .ONESHELL; this used to work before.
The code block that you moved is needed on MS-Windows as well, when
the shell passes the is_bourne_compatible_shell test.
- Re: dynamic object searching, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Tim Murphy, 2013/04/29
- memory allocation (was: Re: Dynamic objects), Paul Smith, 2013/04/29
- Re: memory allocation, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
- Re: Dynamic objects (was: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82), Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29
Message not available
Re: .ONESEHLL not working as expected in 3.82, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/04/29