[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another issue with -O?

From: Tim Murphy
Subject: Re: Another issue with -O?
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 14:30:43 +0100

I've done the "external utility" solution and only because we absolutely had no other choice - it's not much fun and can be done much more effectively by make itself.



On 3 May 2013 14:16, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:57 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
> I think having this facility built into make is a win, especially as
> parallel builds become predominant.  I would be even more happy about it
> if we can get it to the point where it can be enabled by default, and
> users don't even have to worry about it.

I think enabling it by default will be a no-brainer if/when we come up
with a way to get it to produce the same output as without -j.  IOW,
run a parallel build, but output its results as if it were a
non-parallel build.

Bug-make mailing list

You could help some brave and decent people to have access to uncensored news by making a donation at:


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]