Re: Another issue with -O?

[Tim Murphy]

I've done the "external utility" solution and only because we absolutely had no other choice - it's not much fun and can be done much more effectively by make itself.

Regards,

Tim

On 3 May 2013 14:16, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:57:57 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden

>
> I think having this facility built into make is a win, especially as
> parallel builds become predominant.  I would be even more happy about it
> if we can get it to the point where it can be enabled by default, and
> users don't even have to worry about it.

I think enabling it by default will be a no-brainer if/when we come up
with a way to get it to produce the same output as without -j.  IOW,
run a parallel build, but output its results as if it were a
non-parallel build.

_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make

--
You could help some brave and decent people to have access to uncensored news by making a donation at:

http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/friends/