Re: possible solution for -Otarget recurse (was: Re: Some serious issues with the new -O option)

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 20:17:50 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> > From: Paul Smith <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:56:48 -0400
> > 
> > On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 19:36 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > However, I wonder what was the reason for splitting the definition of
> > > GMK_EXPORT in two, and putting each part in a different file.
> > 
> > Well, because the gnumake.h file is intended to be installed into the
> > user's /usr/include or similar, and included in a binary package build
> > of make such as RPM or DEB or whatever, and be included by the user's
> > code, and when it's included there it should NEVER (IIUC) be using the
> > in-make variant.
> 
> That's true, but it's common to have the same header be included when
> building the application or library which provides the exported
> services.
> 
> > However, if you really want it back the way it was please do choose a
> > more unique name than "MAIN".  Something prefixed with "GMK_" at least.
> 
> OK, will do.

Done.