Re: Output sync completed (?)

[Paul Smith]

On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 20:31 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> If the next release is close, then what about the following 2 issues,
> which were discussed, but AFAIK not finalized:
> 
>  . the plugin_is_GPL_compatible symbol in the dynamic objects as a
>    prerequisite for their loading into Make

I talked to RMS about this and he agreed this was needed.  It's on my
todo list.

>  . a more portable way of loading dynamic objects, e.g. by providing a
>    platform-dependent $SOEXT variable that could be used instead of a
>    literal .so or .dll extensions

This one is on my "think about" list.

Plus there are other cleanups needed.  And, even after the first
candidate is posted experience tells me it will be several weeks of
testing before the release itself.

I just want people to start paying attention, if they haven't been so
far...