[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17
From: |
Tim Murphy |
Subject: |
Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17 |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:51:48 +0000 |
On 24 February 2014 18:33, Paul Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> I would definitely want this to be totally invisible to the user and not
> require any magic in makefiles (so no special include operator, etc.)
> Basically it should either be so safe that there's no way to tell the
> difference between using the compiled version or not (other than
> performance), or it should not be generated at all.
Just a word of caution - there is a way in which this kind of thing
can be a mistake, if you take a fairly simple request and expand it
into a general solution for all things, then hit snags and abandon the
whole effort when the initial subcase would have worked.
Regards,
Tim
--
You could help some brave and decent people to have access to
uncensored news by making a donation at:
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/friends/
- Re: speeding up GNU make for LibreOffice by factor ~2 (and dependency file parsing by factor ~10), Bjoern Michaelsen, 2014/02/20
- Re: speeding up GNU make for LibreOffice by factor ~2 (and dependency file parsing by factor ~10), Paul Smith, 2014/02/21
- Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17, Bjoern Michaelsen, 2014/02/24
- Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17, Paul Smith, 2014/02/24
- Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17,
Tim Murphy <=
- Re: Bug-make Digest, Vol 135, Issue 17, Paul Smith, 2014/02/24
Re: speeding up GNU make for LibreOffice by factor ~2 (and dependency file parsing by factor ~10), Daniel Herring, 2014/02/21