[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts
From: |
SF Markus Elfring |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 2015 15:38:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
> Make implementations are notorious for having lots of incompatible
> extensions. That's because the POSIX standard for make (which all
> implementations typically adhere to) is very limited in what it
> requires, so implementations have added their own features in addition
> to the standard, and they rarely are compatible with each other.
I thank you very much for your detailed explanations.
Regards,
Markus
- Re: Better description for "define"?, (continued)
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, Norbert Thiebaud, 2015/01/06
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, Edward Welbourne, 2015/01/07
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts, SF Markus Elfring, 2015/01/11
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts, Paul Smith, 2015/01/11
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts, SF Markus Elfring, 2015/01/12
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts, Paul Smith, 2015/01/12
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts,
SF Markus Elfring <=
- Re: Dynamic evaluation of build scripts, Reinier Post, 2015/01/12
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, Reinier Post, 2015/01/08
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, Paul Smith, 2015/01/05
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, SF Markus Elfring, 2015/01/05
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, Howard Chu, 2015/01/05
- Re: Dynamic adjustments of build dependencies for the number of available processors, SF Markus Elfring, 2015/01/05