[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
include warnings vs -include ignore errors
From: |
Raymond Dubler |
Subject: |
include warnings vs -include ignore errors |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:28 -0700 (PDT) |
My concern is as follows:
Using include blah.d when there is a build rule for blah.d causes the
following:
1. a warning that blah.d is missing
2. execution of rule to build blah.d
a. on success, continue working
b. on failure, display error and terminate
Using -include blah.d when there is a build rule for blah.d causes the
following:
1. no warning that blah.d is missing
2. execution of rule to build blah.d
a. on success, continue working
b. on failure, display error and continue working
What I need is:
1. no warning that blah.d is missing
2. same functionality as include blah.d, ie display error and terminate of
failure
Unless I am missing something in the manual, this is not provided with make.
What are my options here?
--
View this message in context:
http://gnu-make.2324884.n4.nabble.com/include-warnings-vs-include-ignore-errors-tp17136.html
Sent from the Gnu - Make - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- include warnings vs -include ignore errors,
Raymond Dubler <=