Re: Checking application of dependencies from make rules without recipes

[SF Markus Elfring]

> This applies only to implicit rules, not explicit rules.
> 
>> Can an explicit make rule also be cancelled anyhow?
> 
> No.

Thanks for this clarification.


This distinction has got important consequences on how the different
make rule types can and should be ordered relative to each other.
Would you like to point any further details out for the combination
(or distribution) of make rules with the same targets?

Regards,
Markus