[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: posix_spawn() instead of fork()?

From: Barath Aron
Subject: Re: posix_spawn() instead of fork()?
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:28:55 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0

On 03/14/2018 10:21 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
You might get lucky, but the maintainer probably has many other things
to do - your chances will be considerably better if you write a patch
that does it and offer that as implementation.  So perhaps a better
question to ask would be "Would you be receptive to a patch implementing
an alternate version ..."


You have right. But at least my implicit question got answered: no one is working on the posix_spawn() implementation. :) Unfortunatelly, now I'm rewriting the calc's [1] configure [2] mechanism, because it cannot handle cross-compilation.
After I'm done with it, I'll jump into the posix_spawn() thing.


[1] http://www.isthe.com/chongo/tech/comp/calc/
[2] svn://repo.hu/calc-scc/trunk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]