Re: [PATCH] Port to 32-bit long + 64-bit time_t

[Paul Eggert]

On 10/3/22 12:56, Paul Eggert wrote:
> In looking through old dev histories it appears Paul pushes changes 
> every now and then, so I'll wait until he's pushed his next batch of 
> changes, which will presumably include some timestamp-related fixes, 
> before looking into this again.

Thanks, that merge looks good to me.

I might also suggest installing the attached, which contains code that 
won't be executed on any platform that I know about, but which is needed 
to avoid undefined behavior on platforms where INT_MAX == INTMAX_MAX 
(maybe a signal-processing CPU? :-). This is to document the assumption 
that INT_MAX < INTMAX_MAX, not to fix any real bug on any platform I 
know about. Of course this is low priority.

0001-Fix-theoretical-bug-when-int-intmax_t.patch
Description: Text Data