bug-mit-scheme
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-mit-scheme] [bug #47887] etc/make-liarc.sh does not obey --without-


From: William Woodruff
Subject: [Bug-mit-scheme] [bug #47887] etc/make-liarc.sh does not obey --without-x flag
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:41:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47887>

                 Summary: etc/make-liarc.sh does not obey --without-x flag
                 Project: MIT/GNU Scheme
            Submitted by: woodruffw
            Submitted on: Tue 10 May 2016 03:41:04 PM GMT
                Category: compiler
                Severity: 3 - Normal
                Priority: 5 - Normal
              Item Group: Incorrect behavior
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any
                Keywords: 

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

When tweaking the mit-scheme build system for compilation on OS X, I was
unable to get etc/make-liarc.sh to pass --without-x down
to subsequent configure scripts.

As a result, I patched etc/make-liarc.sh conditionally:

if build.without? "x11"
   inreplace "etc/make-liarc.sh" do |s|
     s.gsub! "run_configure", "run_configure --without-x"
   end
end

I'm not sure how this would be integrated into make-liarc.sh statically, but
my best guess is that make-liarc.sh:54 is simply missing "address@hidden" at 
the very
end.

Upstream reference:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/1030





    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47887>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]