[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8
From: |
Daniel Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8 |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Feb 2002 17:20:33 -0800 |
At 06:05 PM 2/1/02 -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:31:12PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> > I think trio has replacement for all the functions. The libxml project
>> > currently uses it and we haven't seen any obvious problems.
>> >
>> > We *need* a 64-bit version of the ncurses library so we're prepared to
>> > submit a patch with *some* solution.
>>
>> sure - I don't have any problem with that. (Disabling the function isn't
>> a very close third alternative).
>
>What's the best way to conditionally compile the trio files if needed?
>I plan on placing the source files in ncurses/base. A few ideas:
Trio does not have the same copyright as ncurses. Trio uses a MIT type
of free software while ncurses uses the GNU Copy-left. The copy-left
strictly forbids mixing copyrights. Distributing trio sources code
with ncurses would violate the copy-left.
The correct way to use trio is at the library level (not the source level).
It's OK to build a libtrio4ncurses.a file but not OK to mix the sources.
(Include files are a special case and are generally exempt from this
restriction.)
Any changes you make directly to ncurses are also OK because they are
original work. Read the Copy-left before deciding how to use these
two packages:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/licenses.html
> 1. add to ncurses/modules but then they'd be compiled all
> the time (though not used)
> 2. hack mk-1st.awk and mk-2nd.awk
> 3. modify ncurses/modules at run time with the new trio files
> 4. modify ncurses/modules and add teh trio libraries but
> preface them by BUILD_TRIO. we'd then run sed on the file
> before feeding to awk to leave them in or remove them depending
> on whether or not the trio libraries are needed.
>
>--
>albert chin (address@hidden)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bug-ncurses mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ncurses
>
-----------------------------
Dan Weaver, ZNYX Networks
address@hidden
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, (continued)
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas Dickey, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas Dickey, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas Dickey, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/02
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8,
Daniel Weaver <=
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Bjorn Reese, 2002/02/02
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Daniel Stenberg, 2002/02/04
- Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Albert Chin, 2002/02/01
Re: Building 64-bit version of ncurses on Solaris 8, Thomas Dickey, 2002/02/02