[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cluster size
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: cluster size |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 19:27:48 +1100 |
Ian wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Yah, I do service work on windows (barf!) machines. We've used
> things like ezdrive to fix old BIOSes (BIOI?), and it does the same thing.
> We've gone to the point of making two 8gb partitions instead of one big
> 15 on machines we can't update the bios. I suppose thats a lazy way of
> doing it, as we probably could find another disc size remap utility.
/me shudders. Damn BIOSes (!)
> What will happen in some cases is scandisk will take forever, to the point
> where you don't want to wait anymore (like several days). It does
> not happen in all cases, or perhaps an error in the file system
> causes it to happen. Older versions of norton ghost do the same thing (4k
> instead of 8k).
Ouch!
So, it's probably when the FATs get to a certain size...?
This could be a problem, because when Parted grows a partition, it
can't grow the cluster size. I guess there's nothing much we can do
about this :-(
So, I guess we're left with: trying to get the cluster size up to
8k for certain size fs's. I'd like to know: at what size should
we use 8k? And 16k?
Thanks,
Andrew Clausen