[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#136730: parted loops endless
From: |
Timshel Knoll |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#136730: parted loops endless |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 23:58:51 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
reopen 136730
retitle 136730 parted exception options difficult to understand
severity 136730 wishlist
forwarded 136730 address@hidden
thanks
Andrew,
Another request to simplify the exception options - I know there are
NLS issues with this :-/
Cheers,
Timshel
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 09:49:31AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Timshel Knoll <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 08:01:08AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > Package: parted
> > > Version: 1.4.24-1
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > This looked like it should work but just keeps asking:
> > >
> > > address@hidden:~# parted -i /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 check
> > > Warning: Device /dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 is neither a SCSI
> > > nor
> > > IDE drive.
> > > Ignore Cancel ? n
> > > Ignore Cancel ?
> > > Ignore Cancel ? y
> > > Ignore Cancel ? n
> > > Ignore Cancel ? n
> >
> > Try 'i' for ignore or 'c' for cancel ... I'm closing this since it's not
> > a "bug", just a usage problem.
>
> Ah that ment to be the possible options for the warning.
>
> Could you rephrace that question to something more comon, like:
>
> Warning: bla blubber [ignore, Cancel]? (with C meaning its the default).
>
> That would make this a wishlist bug.
>
> > It's probably ignoring SIGINT - this is not a bug - but rather a
> > "feature", consider the bad stuff that would happen if you could kill
> > parted half way through a "resize" operation :-/
>
> But I'm not half way through. :)
>
> MfG
> Goswin
>
--
Timshel Knoll <address@hidden> for Debian email: <address@hidden>
Debian GNU/Linux developer, see http://people.debian.org/~timshel/
For GnuPG public key: finger address@hidden
- Re: Bug#136730: parted loops endless,
Timshel Knoll <=