bug-parted
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Parted 1.5.5-pre4


From: Matt_Domsch
Subject: RE: Parted 1.5.5-pre4
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 19:01:16 -0600

> Are there any sample partition tables with sector_size != 512 for
> me to look at?

None that I'm aware of yet.  But for the future, there will be media (not
necessarily disks) with like an 8K sector size.  Note that sector size > cpu
PAGE_SIZE will break Linux badly anyhow.
 
> Are "LBA" values (i.e. fields of on-disk structs with LBA in the name)
> in 512 sectors, or sector_size sectors?

sector_size.
 
> Also, I see no sector_size field in the GPT header... are we meant to
> rely on the hardware for this?!

Yes, hardware defines what its sector_size is.  CD-ROMs use 2048 bytes, most
disks use 512 bytes.  This *does* mean you can't simply dd from a disk with
one sector_size to one with a different size.  Oh well.

This isn't critical BTW, just an observation that parted always uses 512,
and GPT could be more flexible.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Sr. Software Engineer
Dell Linux Solutions www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
#1 US Linux Server provider for 2001! (IDC Mar 2002)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]