[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disk drake
From: |
Andrew Clausen |
Subject: |
Re: disk drake |
Date: |
Tue, 13 May 2003 09:55:34 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 09:13:53PM +0400, Yury Umanets wrote:
> I guess, that ntfs in parted is intersting by itself, but, it makes
> small sence because of the following reasons:
>
> (1) Ntfs is needed only if you are using ntfs on one of yours
> partitions, that is, you have windows on it.
> (2) I'm sceptical about that, anybody will use ntfstools (resize, check,
> etc) under linux if windows present on the box.
Many Windows users would like to use GNU/Linux also. (Conversely,
many GNU/Linux users would like to use Windows occassionally)
I think it is very important, just I'm short on time :(
> Distromakers are not intersted in supporting concurrent product (RedHat
> is promoting and developing ext3).
> If I'm wrong, tell me :)
I think you're wrong :p
They'll support where there is money.
Historically, there hasn't been much money in supporting general purpose
desktop environments in GNU/Linux. Hence, NTFS and Windows compatibility
hasn't been a high priority. (It's too hard and too expensive to enter &
compete in that game).
I haven't been approached by anyone wanting to contract me to do it...
Cheers,
Andrew
- Re: disk drake, (continued)
- Re: disk drake, Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono, 2003/05/12
- Re: disk drake, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2003/05/13
- Re: disk drake, Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono, 2003/05/14
- Re: disk drake, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2003/05/14
- Re: disk drake, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2003/05/14
- Re: disk drake, Andrew Clausen, 2003/05/14
- Re: disk drake, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2003/05/14
- Re: disk drake,
Andrew Clausen <=
- Re: disk drake, Szakacsits Szabolcs, 2003/05/12
- Re: disk drake, Yury Umanets, 2003/05/13
Re: disk drake, K . G ., 2003/05/12