Re: PED_MICRO_VERSION, PED_INTERFACE_AGE, PED_BINARY_AGE in configure.in

[Szakacsits Szabolcs]

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> 
> > Hopefuly with the big changes that will go in 1.6.26 this
> > will be the case (or almost the case at the very least ;)
> > I'll prepare a tag and then ask for review, then for release.
> > I think there's no problem in displaying Parted 1.6.25 at the
> > start of 1.6.25.1 because the code don't change, but if
> > somebody thinks it's better I could directly add ".1" in
> > the source (i don't think autoconf stuffs support x.y.z.t).
> 
> I think 1.6.25 is OK since the codebase is the same and won't matter
> for bug reporting.

Two 1.6.25 releases are highly bad. The only right way is to bump up the
version, document the change so people can know what's going on and act
accordingly.

        Szaka