[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ parted-Bugs-302462 ] linux-swap assertion fail
From: |
noreply |
Subject: |
[ parted-Bugs-302462 ] linux-swap assertion fail |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:27:27 +0000 |
Bugs item #302462, was opened at 2005-11-06 02:26
You can respond by visiting:
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410685&aid=302462&group_id=30287
>Category: libparted
Group: None
Status: Pending
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Nobody (None)
Assigned to: Leslie P. Polzer (dejari-guest)
Summary: linux-swap assertion fail
Initial Comment:
Disk geometry for /dev/hdd: 0kB - 160GB
Disk label type: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 32kB 1003MB 1003MB primary ext3
2 1003MB 10GB 8998MB primary
3 10GB 20GB 10GB primary
4 20GB 160GB 140GB extended
5 20GB 30GB 9994MB logical
6 30GB 40GB 10GB logical
7 40GB 41GB 699MB logical
(parted) mkpart linux-swap
Partition type? [logical]? linux-swap
Partition type? [logical]?
File system type? [ext2]? linux-swap
Start? 40.1GB
End? 40.8GB
You found a bug in GNU Parted.
This may have been fixed in the laical st version of
GNU Parted that you can find at:
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
If this has not been fixed or if you don't know
how to check, please email:
address@hidden
or (preferably) file a bug report at:
http://parted.alioth.debian.org/bugs/
Your report should contain the version of this release (1.6.24)
along with the following message and preferably
additional information about your setup.
Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html
for more informations of what could be
useful for bug submitting!
Assertion (start <= end) at ../../parted/parted.c:251 in function
snap_to_boundaries() failed.
Ignore/Cancel?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Leslie P. Polzer (dejari-guest)
Date: 2005-11-11 13:27
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=12119
Cannot reproduce.
If the problem still persists with 1.6.25, please let me reproduce your setup
by showing me sector sizes:
unit s
print
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Guillaume Knispel (xilun-guest)
Date: 2005-11-09 23:55
Message:
connecté
user_id=11449
I think i fixed that in 1.6.25 (look at the snap_to_boundaries() diffs between
1.6.24 and .25)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410685&aid=302462&group_id=30287