[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PED_PARTITION_NORMAL or PED_PARTITION_PRIMARY ?
|
From: |
solsTiCe d'Hiver |
|
Subject: |
Re: PED_PARTITION_NORMAL or PED_PARTITION_PRIMARY ? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:24:50 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 |
here is the patch for the git repo
--- parted/libparted/disk.c 2007-04-04 14:19:47.000000000 +0200
+++ parted/libparted/disk.c.new 2007-04-05 12:21:58.000000000 +0200
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@
/**
* Create a new \link _PedPartition PedPartition \endlink on \p disk.
*
- * \param type One of \p PED_PARTITION_PRIMARY, \p PED_PARTITION_EXTENDED,
+ * \param type One of \p PED_PARTITION_NORMAL, \p PED_PARTITION_EXTENDED,
* \p PED_PARTITION_LOGICAL.
*
* \note The constructed partition is not added to <tt>disk</tt>'s
- Re: PED_PARTITION_NORMAL or PED_PARTITION_PRIMARY ?,
solsTiCe d'Hiver <=