Re: Circumstances in which ChangeLog format is no longer useful

[Joseph Myers]

On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, John Darrington wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:09:17PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
>      I suggest that Paul's patch be sent to rms for approval/rejection.
> 
> I think it's premature to do that.

Since the discussion has died down (nothing more in the past month), I 
think it clearly *is* now time to involve rms in the question of using 
changeset-level descriptions, not in ChangeLog format and written with the 
expectation that the reader has access to the VCS to look at the details 
of the change if desired.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
address@hidden