[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] different approach to --split html
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] different approach to --split html |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Nov 2000 20:34:04 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden
> Date: 09 Nov 2000 19:14:02 +0100
> >
> > I have a working program that almost does that. (``Almost'' because
>
> A shame that development not open, then. We could (almost) have used
> that!
I don't see how is this related to the development model. That
program was written for a specific project, back when Texinfo didn't
yet have the --html option, and its source is freely available. You
can use it today, if you want. (I use it to maintain a FAQ list which
is generated in several formats, including HTML that is available for
on-line brosing through the Web.)
> > Could you please explain what problems does this introduce (except,
> > perhaps, requiring a second pass)?
>
> I'd say requiring an extra pass is pretty bad?
Given that we already do that, I can't say I agree.
Single-pass operation contradicts several important features (and is a
reason for some extremely hairy code), and I wouldn't recommend giving
up on those features just to save another pass. Today's machines are
quite fast.
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] different approach to --split html, karl, 2000/11/09
Re: Fwd: [PATCH] different approach to --split html, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/11/09